The first concern is the presupposition that today, the children are separate from the people of God. The majority of the churches that are looking for youth pastors tend to have some sort of baptistic background. The history of Baptist theology assumes that children are not yet apart of the people of God until they make a public profession of faith. They are outside of the covenant and promises. The view of baptism is not necessitative of replacing circumcision as the marker of the covenant, but individual acceptance of Christ as your personal saviour. I am not denying that there are churches that have covenantal theology in Baptist circles, but in Baptist covenantalism, the denial of infant baptism is related to the Regulative Principle, which presents a legitimate argument that baptism of infants is never strictly commanded or forbidden (this presents a problem to those who hold to the regulative principle). That is not my battle to fight due to my lack of sympathy to that principle. Applying the term youth pastor hints that the general pastor of a church either does not have the time for the youth, or that they are separate from the people of God and require different instruction. "The parents do this, and the kids do that." This promotes rebellion and a dichotomy that is unnecessary between the youth and elders. The youth group turns into a babysitters club, where kids play games, parents are relieved, and the youth receive platitudes that are hardly applicable to real life situations. All of these situations are the result of the wrong presuppositions when coming to the education of the youth.
This individualistic approach shapes the whole paradigm of the church. Rather than baptism being the marker of the covenant which a congregation awaits the confirmation of that baptism and God's saving work, it has transformed into a dispensational view of God's covenant (I am making a list of assumptions on topics some would understand and apologize to readers who may need more elaboration, but do not stop reading, it becomes applicable!). Surely, something major has occurred, but God's character has not. The youth are separated from the adults in order to present topics in different ways, apart from the wisdom of the elders (not office, but age group) of the congregation. It appears that not only does the theology play a role, but the infatuation of our culture with youth has infected the church. Rather than generational descent being the mark of a fruitful church, the amount of youth in the congregation appeals to people. An overabundance of churches now look to the youth for some sort of cultural wisdom. Our youth are no longer learning from the wise men with crowns of wisdom, but from a more experienced youth.
The major point in which I am leading to is that the "older youth" of the church are NOT equipped to lead and teach the younger youth at all times. Twenty somethings are being given the keys to administer the word without major life experience, wisdom that comes with age, and the experience required to lead young sheep in the sanctification process. How could four years of light theology and sociology introduction classes with small amounts of field experience possibly produce a key leader in the church? The next generation is not to be brought up by the same generation. The wisdom comes from the elders, and those appointed to positions from Biblical sources such as the pastoral letters. This is not discipleship, but a separation of those who need so badly to be told that they are part of the people of God, and that they must live in the obedience to faith in Christ Jesus. Unmarried and newly graduated college students do not have the tools necessary to lead youth in the paths of wisdom. Youth groups have become a marketing tool for the culture and cop-out for pastors and elders from teaching younger generations the truth of Christ. To assume the youth are separate is ignoring a generational theme throughout the Bible narrative. The image of the youth at the Passover feast asking questions to the elders at the time comes to mind. ("Why is this day more important than others," etc.)
We must catechize the youth, but this is not the duty of a random twenty something who has no prior relationship to a congregation and is hired because of a scholastic degree. This is the duty of the parents and the elders of the church, to bring them up in wisdom, teaching, and instruction of the Lord. They are to be well respected and experienced in life. It is not as cut and clean as it may seem. There is not some age that suddenly someone becomes wise, but our present day situation presents clearly the disease of following youthful tendencies. The future leaders need to be discipled in a church for much more time before they reach the point of a primary educator. They need to know the sheep. Adults want to look like the kids, smell like the kids, and act like the kids. We would rather throw our society's elder generations in retirement homes because they can no longer "produce". Their wisdom is much of what we need, but they are ignored. They do not appeal to the corrupt eyes of the fake reality the television presents and promotes. The youthful look is what the youth think is best! Our culture hates the old, our youth are being taught to disrespect elders, and life is over when you reach thirty. This produces a culture where we think we need younger people to lead because it is appealing. Just look at the advertisements for churches all over. We are embracing the culture and letting the church be shaped by it. We say we are not of the world, yet we look exactly like it. Our obsession with youth and its characteristics contribute to many of the overall presuppositions of the American church. There is a reason the youth pastoral office is not mentioned in God's Word, because the correct presupposition is that the youth are not equipped with the ability to lead the people of God. If the youth are in a constant battle inside to find out whether or not they are "saved" and "cool", which is asking the wrong questions, it makes sense to stick in someone old enough to drive yet young enough to dress hip to tell them that over and over "yes". This is so they do not just see "old people" who "don't get me, dude" or talking about "adult stuff". Most of what youth pastors can offer is advice out of speculation and regurgitation, not experience. Wisdom is not derived from speculation or what can be told in a text book. Wisdom is in the leaders of the church, and the leaders of the church are like wine...they become better with time. It is like comparing a rare aged french wine to arbor mist. The experience is more valuable and suitable. What is poured out is a beautiful scent, taste, and color. I would love to quote scripture here in regards to wisdom, but it would be unnecessary to post all of Proverbs here. Let the elders lead the youth to wisdom, not the other way around.

